Continuing the webinar series on “Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience”, a collaboration between AHK Portugal, AHK Hungary and the Cyber Intelligence Institute (CII), we invite you to join the fourth session, dedicated to the topic of crisis communication. “Cyberattack paralyses a company” – what now? How can organizations communicate effectively during a cyber crisis?
When a cyberattack disrupts a company’s operations, communication becomes a strategic leadership responsibility. The way an organization communicates in the first hours can determine whether the incident remains manageable - or develops into a lasting reputational crisis.
This webinar will demonstrate how to communicate clearly, confidently and effectively during the crucial early stages of a cyber crisis. Through practical insights and real-world scenarios, participants will define communication workflows, responsibilities and approval processes, while examining common challenges and proven response strategies for employees, management, customers, partners and the media.
The objective is to provide organizations with suitable frameworks and practical guidance to help them navigate cyber incidents with confidence, maintain operational control and protect stakeholder trust.
Thomas Reinhold, an experienced partner on the CII Advisory Board, will address these questions, highlighting the specific implications of these threats for companies and exploring the most effective ways to react and respond.
Date
23rd March
from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. (GMT)
Venue
Online via Teams
(the access link will be sent on the day before the webinar)
Language
English
Registration
Participation in the initiative is free of charge for members of the AHK network, but subject to prior registration.
Directly on the AHK Hungary website: ahkungarn.hu/de/events-details/cii-focus-series-4-focus-on-crisis-communication/online-registration-cii-focus-series-4-focus-on-crisis-communication-23.03.2026
Further topics in the focus series:
- Focus on digital sovereignty & hyperscalers – Technological independence – pipe dream or competitive advantage?